Incorrect or Inconsistent Scientific Interpretations KRS Murthy

Incorrect or Inconsistent Scientific Interpretations

KRS Murthy

1. Most of the scientists who have discovered, and those who have interpreted the phenomena, have made many wrong assumptions, some with lack of understanding of the real nature of light, whereas others for the convenience of simplicity. The electrons in the atoms have been assumed to be at rest, instead of the reality that no electron is at rest, and has never been at rest.
2. They have considered light as a photon some times, and interchangeably considered it as a wave, with no consideration to be consistent, at least based on the situation.
3. The molecular structure, its activity states, vibrational states, rotational states, and intermolecular activities should be broken down to the constituent activities and states in terms of the different atoms, the different electrons of the different atoms, shared activity of the electrons between neighboring atoms.
4. The freedom or lack of any freedom for the electrons as it is bound to the nucleus and the other atoms in the same atom is not even properly considered in most of the analyses and interpretation of the physics behind the activities and interaction of the electrons with, for example light, or other elementary particle of nature.
5. Many scientists are hiding behind mathematics as a shield, back up with no ability to understand or provide as a backup the physical interpretation of the mathematical terms, mathematical expressions and equations of the different steps of derivation and assumptions of the components of the mathematical independent and dependent variables.
6. Diagrammatic presentations, cartoon versions of explanations of physics, graphs and charts have been either misleading or incorrect. For example, many text books, teacher and student notes, research papers, lecture notes present and interpretations show or depict the electromagnetic wave form of light as if it travels like the waves in an ocean or a pond.